- Tumblr
By Roberta Smith
Without Sally Michel there would have been no Milton Avery, or at least not as much. They met in 1924 and married in 1926. For much of their marriage, Michel (1902-2003) worked as a freelance illustrator, enabling Avery (1885-1965) to focus on his painting. A painter as well, Michel made this sacrifice because she was convinced of Avery’s greatness. She also adapted the simplified forms from his style, which put her further in his shadow.
This excellent exhibition sheds needed light, presenting about 30 of Michel’s paintings from the 1950s, lent by the Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation. Mostly landscapes, they are clumsier but also more intense, less Olympian than Avery’s works. They tend to be smaller and richer in color, which compresses their force. But most important, Michel dissented from her husband’s spare use of paint applied in thin washes of color (which presaged stain painting).
Her mountain and lake views are actively worked in contrasting textures and patterns. In “Forest Edge,” numerous greens are painted over one another, as if to indicate different species of trees. Sometimes, as in “Field in Hilly Landscape,” a blanketing forest is enlivened by tiny bits of bare canvas that suggest light or movement. The grays and whites of the nearly abstract “Birds,” which seems to depict gulls above a narrow band of waves, display a fairly juicy impasto. In another direction, the anomalous “Urban Landscape” — a street view with bare trees and dark buildings, a rare subject for Michel — has the simplified Precisionism of George Ault.